Overview & grading
How the Writing section works and how your texts are graded. Ten minutes here saves you marks everywhere else.
The Writing section
You have 120 minutes for two tasks: one longer (~400 words, at B2 usually the essay) and one shorter (~250 words). Writing is one of four equally weighted sections of the written exam, alongside Reading, Listening and Language in Use.
| Text type | Word count | Register | Title? | Key feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | ~400 words (360–440) | Formal | Required | Argue your position with evidence |
| Article | ~250 or ~400 words | Depends on the audience | Required – catchy! | Write for real readers |
| Report | ~250 or ~400 words | Formal, objective, neutral | Subject line + section headings | Present findings and recommend action |
| Blog | ~250 or ~400 words | Informal to semi-formal | Post only (not a comment) | Personal voice, invite interaction |
| ~250 words (225–275) | Formal | Required | Clear purpose, proper format |
How you are graded – the four criteria
Each text is rated with the official analytic scale: four independent criteria, each scored 0–10 and equally weighted – weaker areas can be compensated by stronger ones.
What the bands mean (simplified)
Everything the task asks for, fully developed with well-chosen details. Conventions confidently used, wide range of vocabulary and complex structures, only occasional slips.
All content points developed with relevant details. Clear structure, good range and variety, errors are rare and never cause misunderstanding.
This is the pass line of the official grid: all points developed but with limited supporting detail, a limited but appropriate set of linking devices, enough range including some complex forms, errors without damage to communication.
Content points addressed but not developed, mostly simple linear sentences, repetition and lifting from the prompt, or errors pile up beyond simple structures.
Only parts of the task recognisable, very limited language, errors make parts of the text hard to understand.
No assessable performance – or the text fails to address the set task (see the VETO rule above).
The 8 most expensive mistakes
None of these is a talent problem. Each one is a habit you can train away in an afternoon.
| Mistake | What it costs | The fix |
|---|---|---|
| Writing only 2 of 3 bullet points | Task Achievement drops sharply | → Tick off each bullet as you write it |
| Ignoring the text type’s rules (e.g. a report without headings) | Task Achievement drops – conventions are part of the criterion | → Check the Layout box in the guide before you start |
| Copying words from the prompt | Range drops | → Rephrase the task’s words – use synonyms |
| Word count off by more than ±10% | Task Achievement drops one band | → Count your words. Practise estimating. |
| Formal style in a blog (or vice versa) | Wrong register = lower Task Achievement | → Ask: formal or informal? Then commit. |
| Only simple linking words | Low Coherence score | → Use the B2 linking words table |
| No topic sentences | Paragraphs feel random, weak Coherence | → First sentence of each paragraph = the point |
| Forgetting to proofread | Errors you would catch in 3 minutes | → Always save 5–10 min at the end |